Monthly Archives: January 2012

Alec Castle

Alec CastleBrent Council Liberal Democrat Group regrets to announce the death of Cllr Alec Castle.

Alec Castle was a long-serving and dedicated councillor who spent nine-and-a-half years representing local residents on Brent Council. First elected in May 1998 he served until May 2002. He was then elected again in May 2006 and re-elected in May 2010 for the Dollis Hill ward.

He was an active member of the council, serving at different time on the Executive and as Chair of an Overview and Scrutiny Committee. He devoted much effort to taking up the concerns of his constituents and working in his community.

Alec began his political career in the Labour movement, and spent time as a union official representing his colleagues. He was active in the political upheavals of the 1960s and was one of the Vietnam War protestors present at the 1968 ‘Battle of Grosvenor Square’ outside the US Embassy, something he recalled with great pride in later life.

In 1998 he was elected to Brent Council as a Labour councillor for Tokyngton ward, serving for four years. Alec’s break with the Labour party came when the Labour government in 2003 backed American President George Bush’s decision to invade Iraq. He joined the Liberal Democrats and very quickly became active in local campaigning before being elected for a second term on Brent Council as councillor for Dollis Hill in May 2006.

He served as Chair of the Willesden Area Consultative Forum and on the Brent Housing Partnership Board between 2006 and 2010 and was a member of the council’s Executive for a year. During this time he concentrated particularly on improving housing support for vulnerable people. Until his illness he was a key member of the campaign against the Brent Cross development proposals.

Councillor Alec Castle and Sarah Teather speaking at a Brent Cross Planning meeting

Councillor Alec Castle and Sarah Teather speaking at a Brent Cross Planning meeting

Away from local politics Alec was passionate about Africa and he visited the continent regularly. He devoted enormous effort to providing practical help and support for projects. He worked closely with VSO and spent over a year in Nigeria helping to set up an IT system for a local school. In recent years he established a new non-governmental organisation (NGO) in Kenya.

Professionally, Alec gained a PhD in biochemistry and in later years lectured in information technology. He put his IT skills to work both in his political and overseas work.

He endured increasing medical problems with stoicism and strength, enduring numerous operations to tackle his cancer which affected his speech and his mobility. Despite the problems this caused him he continued to attend council meetings until very recently and took an active interest in council issues until the end.

Although unable to attend meetings in person after Christmas he continued to communicate with colleagues and the council by email from home.

Dollis Hill ward colleague and Liberal Democrat Whip Councillor Jack Beck said:

Alec was a man of great conviction and also great warmth. He will be very much missed not only by his colleagues but by many other people in Brent and beyond whom he helped and supported.

Dollis Hill Liberal Democrat ward colleague Javaid Ashraf said:

I first got to know Alec when as my ward councillor he helped to form the Pinemartin Close Residents Association. I joined him as a councillor in 2010, and feel great sadness at the loss of a great councillor, colleague, and personal friend.

Brent Central MP Sarah Teather said:

Alec was a good man and an excellent Councillor. He was someone who had a real commitment to improving his community whether in his ward or through his voluntary work in Africa. When I think of him one of my abiding memories will always be our canvassing sessions when we would lose him because he would stop and talk to people for so long. We would always have to send search parties back to find him and fish him off the doorstep. His loss will be felt deeply by all who knew and worked with him.

Willesden Green Library redevelopment plans face scrutiny

Plans to shut Willesden Green Library and provide only a limited service from temporary premises during the 18-20 months of closure will come under the microscope at a meeting of the Call-in Overview and Scrutiny Committee on Wednesday 1 February.

Six Liberal Democrat councillors have ‘called in’ three of the decisions made by Brent Council’s Labour Executive relating to the redevelopment of Brent Library.

They are concerned that the temporary replacement service being provided by the council while Willesden Green Library is closed will not be adequate, especially as the closure comes soon after half of Brent’s libraries were controversially closed by Brent’s Labour councillors.

Liberal Democrat Group Leader Paul Lorber, who is one of the councillors behind the call-in said:

Willesden Library is the main alternative for former users of the Cricklewood, Kensal Rise and Neasden libraries that Labour closed. Now the council plans to take Willesden Library away for over eighteen months as well. We need to make sure a first-class alternative service is available. The obvious thing is to re-open the currently empty libraries for public use.

Councillors will also examine the ‘public engagement’ strategy [PDF, 5MB] due to be delivered by the developer’s PR consultants in advance of the council deciding the planning application.

Cllr Lorber added

We need a genuine consultation which will take local people’s views into account and make changes if necessary. The last thing we need is a glossy exercise designed by PR consultants to sell the scheme to residents. Unfortunately the strategy agreed by the executive sets out no objectives and does not say what will happen to residents’ views once they have been collected. I hope we can clear this up at the scrutiny meeting.

The full text of the call in reads:

Willesden Green Redevelopment Project

The reasons for the call in are:-

1) Delegation of authorisation of detailed design (recommendation 2.4 in the report): it is appropriate that a decision of this significance is signed off by members, especially if the consultation process or other pressures result in a need to reconsider elements of the scheme or choose between options.

2) Interim service delivery strategy (recommendation 2.5)

a) Lack of clarity over important aspects of the alternative provision including the size of the premises at Grange Road and details of other premises in the Willesden Green area being explored.

b) Lack of serious consideration of the use of available closed libraries to aid the delivery of services as evidenced by the perfunctory nature of paragraph 6.29 in the report.

c) It is incorrect to state that the provision of transport services to aid access to alternative study space is outside the council’s powers (para. 9.23). The council has a number of potentially relevant powers including the power of well-being.

 3) Lack of clarity in the papers provided to members at the Executive meeting about the design and functions of the proposed new building including:

a) No information (even in broad terms) about how the available floorspace will be split between the different uses and the projected income from the proposed commercial uses.

b) No information about the architectural and design approach to the development or the planning considerations and risks (other the risk of local objections set out on page 54) that the design has to take into account.

c) Lack of clear explanation about how the zero net capital cost will be achieved.

d) Inadequate consideration of the risk of construction costs being greater than anticipated and the extent to which the additional costs might fall on the council if they are not the responsibility of the contractor; and inadequate assurance about financial control of the project subsequent to detailed design development and prior to practical completion.

 4) Defects in the decision making process including:

a) lack of information provided to members about the revenue consequences of the recommended decision (section 7 asserts that all future revenue costs will be contained with existing budget allocations for the management of the WGLC but there are no figures to support this. Additionally there is no mention of the revenue implications of the non-cultural centre functions such as office space and contact centre).

b) lack of access to Background Papers despite requests in good time

 5) Consultation strategy (recommendation 2.7)

a) The agreed consultation strategy does not include any objectives nor does it specify what scope there is for the current design to be altered in response to the consultation. It is therefore unclear to what extent this is a genuine consultation strategy and to what extent it is simply a public engagement strategy designed to provide reassurance and promote the project to stakeholders.

b) There is no mention in the report, recommendation or consultation strategy of reporting back the outcome of the consultation to members (Executive or Scrutiny) to enable consideration of the views expressed.

Suggested action for the Call In Overview and Scrutiny Committee to take:-

Consider the revenue implications of the decision to assure value for money and the other issues raised above.

 Recommend that:

  • The decision about the detailed design and costs be taken by the Executive and not delegated;
  • The interim service delivery strategy be revised to provide more library floorspace and more accessibility to the museum collection than the present proposals deliver, possibly including use of currently closed library premises to avoid the need to pay rent;
  • Objectives be set for the consultation strategy; the process for considering and responding to consultation feedback be clarified and publicised to stakeholders in due course; a resident / stakeholder liaison group be created as part of the consultation strategy.

Brent Lib Dem Leader to help MPs with their Inquiry

UPDATE: The committee has now changed its criteria for witnesses so Paul will no longer be giving evidence. He has written to the committee with additional information.

Liberal Democrat Group Leader Paul Lorber has been invited to appear as a witness in front of the House of Commons Culture Media and Sport Committee to discuss library closures.

The committee launched an Inquiry into Library Closures in November 2011. It finished accepting written evidence on Thursday 12 January and is due to hold oral hearings in February. Cllr Lorber is expected to appear on Tuesday 21 February.

Cllr Lorber said:

I am pleased the committee found the evidence I submitted to the Inquiry useful and I look forward to discussing it with Members of Parliament.

Brent Council is an object lesson in how not to modernise a library service and I hope other councils will learn from the mistakes that the Labour-run council has made. It is not too late for the Secretary of State to intervene.

Brent Council has closed a higher proportion of its libraries (half) than any other local authority and has therefore attracted particular attention. Cllr Paul Lorber was Leader of Brent Council between 2006 and 2010, during which time the administration that he led rejected the option of library closures and set out a strategy to improve library provision. He has been a strong supporter of the campaign to save the six Brent libraries now closed by Labour councillors.
 
Recommendations from Select Committees are influential and often attract widespread media coverage. The Government is obliged to publish a response to recommendations made by Select Committees. However the committee has no power to force Brent Council or the Secretary of State to act.

Campaign for Brent’s libraries enters new stage

Councillor Paul Lorber, leader of the Liberal Democrat Group on Brent Council, has urged local people to continue to support their local and the Brent SOS Libraries Campaign.

Library campaigners including Lib Dem councillors Sami Hashmi, Paul Lorber, Barry Cheese and Ann Hunter gathering support for the

Library campaigners, including Lib Dem councillors Sami Hashmi (far left), Paul Lorber (middle, behind board), Barry Cheese (third right) and Ann Hunter (far right), gathering support for the Save Our Libraries campaign outside Willesden Green library

Brent Library campaigners, including Cllr Lorber, made their views known to the House of Commons Culture Media and Sport Committee last week by submitting evidence to the Select Committee’s Libraries Closure Inquiry.

Members of Parliament on the committee are looking at the impact on local communities of library closures across the country and are expected to hold public hearings once the evidence has been considered. Labour-run Brent Council is believed to have introduced the most damaging library closure programme anywhere in the UK. The drastic cuts in the borough are expected to feature in the Inquiry.

Councillor Paul Lorber said

Labour councillors in Brent are decimating our library service. Tens of thousands of Brent residents all the way from Kensal Rise to Sudbury have been deprived of a library service. Labour cannot be trusted on Libraries.

As the council can no longer provide the comprehensive and efficient library service required by local people the time has come for the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to step in and stand up for local people.

The library service is set to deteriorate further if Brent Council’s Executive tonight (Monday 16 January) rubber-stamps the planned closure of the flagship Willesden Green library for over 18 months.

Willesden Green library received half a million visits in 2009/10 and is the library that users of the now-closed Kensal Green and Cricklewood libraries are advised by the council to use instead.

Despite this the council does not plan to provide effective alternative provision for Willesden Green Library users during the closure period but instead has plans to open a ‘pop-up’ library in Grange Road and scattered internet access across a range of council buildings.

Re-opening the closed libraries in the south of the borough during the closure period would provide additional space for students and displaced library users, according to library campaigners.